Arowana launches SGD120 million B Corp holding company out of Singapore, appoints B Lab Global co-founder Andrew Kassoy and Thomas Ng to the Advisory Board
Arowana’s B Corp holding company will provide a succession and ownership transition pathway for B Corp founders seeking to exit but retain the ethos of their businesses
Investment focus will initially be on the ASEAN region but in time look to expand to other developing economies across the MENA and Latin American regions with large and growing populations
Arowana, the global B Corporation investment group, announced today that it has launched a holding company headquartered in Singapore to specifically invest in companies committed to the B Corp triple bottom line of People, Planet, and Profit across the ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) region.
The primary purpose of this holding company, AIC Group Holdings, is to provide companies that are B Corp or want to become B Corp with an ownership succession pathway, which will respect and perpetuate the B Corp ethos and culture instilled by their founders. AIC Group Holdings is privately held.
In tandem with the launch of the holding company, Arowana has appointed Andrew Kassoy, co-founder of B Lab Global, the non-profit behind the B Corp movement, to the Advisory Board of AIC Group Holdings. In addition, Thomas Ng, a leading B Corp entrepreneur and founder of Genashtim, a fast-growing global social enterprise, has agreed to join the Advisory Board.
Arowana founder and chairman, Kevin Chin, commented: “We have been working on optimising a structure for two years and believe a holding company that has no restrictions in terms of investment entry and exit horizons is the best model that matches the succession and growth objectives of B Corp founders and their businesses. As a B Corp ourselves, we appreciate the dilemma that founders face in this regard. We consider Singapore to be the ideal headquarters for this holding company as we see many enterprises across the fast-growing ASEAN region that would be a good fit. This is consistent with Arowana’s broader strategy of pivoting our focus to developing markets across ASEAN and, in due time, Africa and Latin America with large and growing populations and economies.”
He further added: “I am honoured that two luminaries of the B Corp movement, Andrew Kassoy and Thomas Ng, have agreed to join the Arowana holding company advisory board members. Not only are Andrew and Thomas great stewards, but also world-class entrepreneurs who have led the scale-up of high-growth global enterprises. We expect to announce further additions to the advisory board and the holding company team in due course. Meanwhile, our team is already in exclusive due diligence processes on four proprietary investment opportunities in the ASEAN region that have come about because of Arowana’s veritable commitment to the B Corp ethos.”
Andrew Kassoy, co-founder of B Lab Global, commented: “Since the earliest days of the B Corp movement, we have seen first-hand the issues of succession and ownership transition faced by B Corp founders, especially when deliberating on acquisition proposals from non-B Corp entities. I am excited to join the Arowana B Corp holding company advisory board as I share the vision that Kevin Chin has in creating a permanent capital holding company structure with a genuine B Corp ethos that provides a compelling option for B Corp founders exploring succession and exit.”
Thomas Ng, B Corp steward and founder, said: “Having known Kevin Chin for some time and seeing first-hand his steadfast commitment to the B Corp values and mission, I am delighted to be joining the Arowana B Corp holding company advisory board. Across Genashtim’s operations in the ASEAN, African and Latin America regions, we see many businesses that the Arowana B Corp holding company would represent an attractive alternative to consider for succession and ownership transition.”
Green Antz, backed by Arowana Impact Capital, sets another record-breaking year in plastic recycling
Arowana Impact Capital (AIC) is proud to announce that it has increased its investment shareholding in Green Antz, a frontrunner in the plastic waste recycling and upcycling industry in the Philippines. This decision signals AIC’s commitment to fostering environmental sustainability and supporting innovative solutions to the global plastic crisis.
Over the past year, Green Antz has showcased exceptional performance in its operations. The company’s dedication to tackling plastic waste has yielded remarkable results, with the volume of plastics collected soaring by a staggering 334%, reaching a groundbreaking total of 2,290 metric tonnes. This achievement highlights Green Antz’s effective collection strategies and its pivotal role in mitigating pollution.
Green Antz’s efforts extend beyond mere plastic waste collection by expanding into upcycling solutions. By continuously innovating and enhancing its capacity to recycle and upcycle plastic waste, Green Antz is setting new benchmarks in the industry. These initiatives are crucial in transforming waste into valuable resources, thereby contributing to the circular economy and reducing the reliance on virgin plastics.
AIC’s increased shareholding comes at a time when Green Antz is navigating through a phase of exponential growth and the challenges that accompany such rapid expansion. This growth is a testament to the company’s robust business model, its impactful environmental solutions, and the increasing awareness and demand for sustainable practices among consumers and industries.
The success of Green Antz is a reflection of the strong network of support from its shareholders, customers, and partners.
Arowana Impact Capital, along with other shareholders, has played a significant role in enabling Green Antz to pursue its mission with vigour and resilience. The company’s achievements are further bolstered by the backing of major customers and partners, including global giants like Procter & Gamble, Colgate-Palmolive, and Shell, among others. These collaborations underscore the collective effort and commitment to addressing the global plastic waste challenge and fostering a sustainable future.
The partnership between AIC and Green Antz exemplifies the power of impact investing – a strategy that aims not only to generate financial returns but also to create positive social and environmental impacts. This approach is increasingly gaining traction among investors who recognise the critical need to support businesses that are contributing to a sustainable and equitable world.
As Green Antz continues to advance its mission of reducing plastic waste through innovative recycling and upcycling solutions, its journey is an inspiration for other companies striving to make a difference. The company’s success demonstrates that – with the right mix of innovation, commitment, and support – it is possible to turn the tide on plastic pollution and pave the way for a more sustainable planet.
AIC’s increased stake in Green Antz is a vote of confidence in the potential of green businesses to drive meaningful change. It reflects a growing recognition of the importance of environmental sustainability in shaping a better future for our planet. As more investors and companies align their operations with sustainable practices, the dream of a cleaner, greener world becomes increasingly attainable.
The partnership between AIC and Green Antz is another example of how impact investing can catalyse significant environmental change. In supporting innovative solutions to pressing global challenges, the investment lays the groundwork for a sustainable future, proving that doing good also means doing well.
Tackling the Plastic Waste Pollution in the Philippines: A Path to a Cleaner Future
With its breathtaking natural beauty and vibrant communities, the Philippines faces a growing crisis that threatens its environment and well-being: plastic waste pollution. In recent years, the archipelago has witnessed a surge in plastic waste, from urban centres to remote beaches.
In this AIC Insight, we'll take a closer look at the magnitude of the Philippines’ plastic waste pollution problem. We’ll explore the different the innovative solutions and strategies that may hold the key to a cleaner, more sustainable future.
Plastic Pollution in the Philippines: The Alarming Reality
The plastic waste crisis in the Philippines has reached a critical point, with numerous challenges and implications. These include:
Marine Impact - Approximately 20% of this plastic waste finds its way into the ocean, devastating marine ecosystems and endangering marine life.
Health Hazards - The improper disposal of plastics poses health risks to communities, as toxic chemicals leach into the soil and water.
Urban Eyesore - Plastic pollution has transformed once-beautiful landscapes into unsightly and polluted areas, impacting tourism and quality of life.
The Human Toll of Plastic Waste
The plastic pollution problem continues to affect communities across the Philippines. People living in vulnerable areas, such as highly urbanised cities and coastal towns, bear most of the brunt.
Coastal Communities
Fishing communities face declining catches due to plastic contamination in waters and coastal areas.
Health Impacts
Plastic pollution contributes to health issues, particularly among marginalized communities living near polluted areas.
Economic Losses
Tourism, a vital sector for the Philippines, suffers as pristine beaches are marred by plastic debris.
Causes and Drivers of Plastic Pollution
A multitude of factors drives the plastic waste crisis in the Philippines:
Single-Use Culture - The prevalence of single-use plastics, such as sachets, contributes significantly to the problem.
Inadequate Waste Management - Gaps in waste collection, recycling, and disposal systems exacerbate the issue.
Lack of Awareness - Limited awareness of plastic pollution's consequences hinders meaningful change.
Economic Pressures - The "tingi-tingi" culture of selling small quantities in disposable packaging remains popular due to financial constraints.
Innovative Solutions: The Path Forward
Addressing the plastic pollution crisis in the Philippines requires a comprehensive strategy. This is where a multi-pronged approach is needed to solve each challenge.
1. Policy Reforms
Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Act - The EPR Act holds manufacturers accountable for the entire life cycle of their products, encouraging sustainable practices.
Single-Use Plastic Ban - Strict regulations and bans on single-use plastics can curb their consumption and production.
2. Waste Management
Enhanced Collection Systems - Investments in efficient waste collection and recycling infrastructure are crucial.
Community Engagement - Education and awareness programs empower communities to adopt responsible waste management practices.
3. Circular Economy
Transition to a Circular Economy - A shift from a linear to a circular economy promotes recycling, reusing, and repurposing of materials.
Innovation in Packaging - Eco-friendly packaging solutions and alternatives can reduce plastic usage.
4. Clean-Up Initiatives
Coastal Clean-Up - Regular beach and coastal clean-up drives help remove existing plastic waste from sensitive ecosystems.
Plastic Waste Banks - Encouraging the collection and exchange of plastic waste for rewards can incentivize recycling.
5. Education and Awareness
Environmental Education - Integrating environmental education into school curricula fosters a sense of responsibility from a young age.
Media Campaigns - Engaging media campaigns raise awareness and mobilize support for plastic pollution solutions.
6. Collaboration
Public-Private Partnerships - Collaboration between government, businesses, and civil society organizations strengthens plastic waste management efforts.
Innovation Hubs - Establishing innovation hubs and research centres can drive the development of sustainable alternatives to plastics.
Success Stories and Progress
Despite the heavy toll that plastic pollution has brought on Philippine communities, there is still hope for change. Various government and non-government organisations have launched initiatives to clean up existing plastic waste throughout the years.
There have also been efforts to introduce ways to minimise the Filipinos’ dependence on plastic containers and eliminate the tingi-tingi (micro-retailing) system.
Community-Led Initiatives - Grassroots movements and community-driven clean-up efforts showcase the power of collective action.
Eco-Entrepreneurship - Filipino entrepreneurs are leading the way in developing eco-friendly products and packaging.
Policy Momentum - The Philippines' commitment to addressing plastic pollution through legislation and policy reforms is gaining momentum.
Investing in a Sustainable Future for the Philippines
The plastic pollution crisis in the Philippines is a complex challenge that requires concerted efforts from all stakeholders. However, with innovative solutions, policy reforms, and a commitment to sustainable practices, the country can overcome this crisis and build a cleaner, more resilient future.
By embracing a circular economy, redefining consumption patterns, and investing in responsible waste management, the Philippines can transform itself into a model of environmental stewardship. Together, we can work towards a future where the breathtaking beauty of the archipelago is preserved, communities thrive, and marine life flourishes in clean, plastic-free waters.
The solution to plastic waste lies within our grasp. We just need to embrace these initiatives for the sake of the Philippines as well as the rest of the planet.
Arowana Impact Capital Joins 2X Global to Advance Gender Equality and Diversity in Impact Investing
Arowana Impact Capital (AIC), the impact investing arm of award-winning B Corp global investment firm Arowana, today joins the world’s leading alliance of investors, capital providers, and intermediaries focussed on investing with a gender and broader diversity & equity lens – 2X Global.
The partnership further strengthens AIC’s commitment to delivering sustainable impact and is in recognition of its view that promoting gender equality, especially in emerging markets, has a powerful multiplier effect. As a member of 2X Global, AIC stands in solidarity with other leaders in the global finance industry in unlocking gender-smart capital for businesses that aim to empower women and their communities.
Established in 2018, 2X Global has helped catalyse billions of dollars in gender-smart investments and opportunities worldwide. The 2X Challenge – a flagship initiative of 2X Global – raised US$16.3bn in gender lens investments between 2021 and 2022, surpassing its target of US$15bn and benefitting over 470 businesses geared towards women’s economic empowerment across developing economies. Moreover, the initiative has also raised over $27.7bn since its launch at the G7 Summit in 2018.
Gender lens investments aim to empower women by providing them with better opportunities for entrepreneurship, leadership roles, quality employment, improved financial health, and access to gender-smart products and services. This approach works to enhance women’s economic participation and create a more inclusive and equitable society.
Jessica Espinoza, CEO, 2X Global, said: “We are thrilled to welcome Arowana, a distinguished global B Corp, as a valued member of the 2X Global family. This partnership strengthens our collective effort to unlock opportunities, amplify women’s economic participation and foster an inclusive growth ecosystem across Asia. With Arowana Impact Capital by our side, we are poised to accelerate our mission and make an even greater impact on gender lens investing. Together we build a more equitable, sustainable and prosperous future.”
Kevin Chin, Founder and Chairman, Arowana Impact Capital, said: “Since a field trip to Cambodia in 2006, I have seen first-hand, time and time again, the transformative and multiplicative power of female entrepreneurship at a grassroots level across the ASEAN region. We are very pleased to now be joining forces and partnering with 2X Global in empowering women entrepreneurs and promoting diversity in the business world.
“With 2X Global, we are fortunate to be working closely with an inspiring network of like-minded leaders in the global gender finance industry. By unlocking gender-smart capital, 2X Global can help fuel the growth and success of businesses that champion women’s economic empowerment. This collaboration allows us to amplify our impact and make a meaningful difference in the lives of women and their communities especially in emerging markets.”
About 2X Global
2X Global is a global membership and field-building organisation for investors, capital providers, and intermediaries working in public and private markets, across both developed and emerging economies. By working together with the full spectrum of investors, capital providers, mobilisers, and influencers, we shape the market on a whole new level, ultimately transforming systems of finance through the gender-smart deployment of capital across asset classes and markets.
About Arowana Impact Capital
Launched in 2019, Arowana Impact Capital focusses on impact investing in Southeast Asia. AIC’s core purpose is to help build people, build companies, and build value through sustainable investment practices across the ASEAN region.
In focussing on the four key areas of livelihood creation, access to education and healthcare, sustainable urbanisation, and financial inclusion, AIC is helping to contribute towards the successful achievement of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
A staggering 500,000 kilograms of plastic waste collected in Q1 2023
In the battle against plastic pollution, Green Antz Builders – an eco-friendly construction materials company backed by Arowana Impact Capital – has collected a staggering 500,000 kilograms of plastic waste in the first quarter of 2023 alone.
This represents an astounding 829% increase year-on-year in plastic waste collection, ultimately preventing plastic waste from polluting landfills and waterways.
The volume of plastic waste diverted from traditional disposal methods is truly remarkable. To put it into perspective, these collection efforts have prevented the equivalent in weight from contributing to the ever-growing plastic pollution crisis:
83 million plastic utensils
14 million plastic bottles
50 million plastic cups
100 million plastic bags
Each of these numbers represents countless potential sources of pollution transformed into opportunities for effecting environmental change.
Green Antz converts plastic waste into eco-friendly construction materials, including eco-bricks and pavers. The company is helping businesses and communities achieve their Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) targets by establishing effective recycling and waste management systems and empowering others to make a tangible difference in the fight against plastic pollution.
Backing Green Antz Builders in their commitment to environmental sustainability is Arowana Impact Capital, the lead investor in the company.
At AIC, our focus on sustainability extends beyond solving the current plastic waste crisis to provide long-term practical solutions for the construction industry to minimise its environmental footprint.
As we confront the urgent challenges posed by plastic waste, we work together with our partners in living out the principles of environmental stewardship and resourcefulness and paving the way for a future where plastic waste is minimised, communities thrive, and our planet thrives alongside them.
What the Extended Producer Responsibility Act Means for the Philippines
The Extended Producer Responsibility Act of 2022 is the latest and strongest attempt by the Philippines to curb plastic pollution. For years, the country has had to deal with high volumes of plastic waste. In fact, a World Bank report estimated that the Philippines produces approximately 2.7 million tons of plastics each year. About 20 percent of these materials make their way to the ocean.
Through the new law, the government hopes to reduce the number of plastics that end up in the environment. It enlists the help of large enterprises by making them more responsible for their own waste. This addresses the issue of plastic packaging waste directly through the source.
What is the EPR Act and how can it help solve the long-time problem of plastic waste in the Philippines? What responsibilities do businesses need to meet in order to adhere to the new law?
Extended Producer Responsibility Act (EPRA)
The Philippines is one of the leading producers and users of plastics in the world, generating an estimated 2.7 million tons annually.
The Extended Producer Responsibility Act is a law that requires large companies to manage their own plastic packaging waste. Also known as Republic Act No. 11898, the legislation lapsed into law on 23 July 2022.
Under the EPRA, enterprises with over P1 billion worth of total assets must recover a specific portion of their waste. Failure to do so would land them a hefty fine from the Philippine government.
The new law is based on Extended Producer Responsibility, a concept first introduced by Swedish academic Thomas Lindhqvist in 1990. Lindhqvist outlined an environmental protection strategy where manufacturers take on the responsibility for the entire life cycle of their products. This includes the take-back, recycling, and final disposal of such products.
EPR programs around the world
Many other countries have already developed EPR schemes that are designed to meet the unique challenges of their economies.
In North America, the United States and Canada have implemented the Product Stewardship Program. The initiative encourages manufacturers to re-design their products, change their marketing methods, and adopt innovative collection and recycling programs.
In Asia, Japan and South Korea were the first countries to adopt Extended Producer Responsibility frameworks. South Korean manufacturers and importers are required to pay an Advance Disposal Fee for products that are difficult to recycle.
The Philippines' EPR Framework
Filipinos’ heavy reliance on the ‘sachet economy’ has contributed to the high volume of plastic waste in the country.
The EPR Act framework aims to reduce the number of materials and wastes that end up in landfills. It tasks companies with finding new purposes for their products, whether through reuse or recycling. Those that can no longer be repurposed should be allowed to biodegrade without impacting the environment.
The law eschews the traditional ‘tingi-tingi’ system that is prevalent in the Philippines. It’s a common practice where manufacturers sell their products individually in disposable packaging. The system offers many cash-strapped Filipinos a more affordable and convenient way to buy basic goods. However, it leads to more single-use plastics being produced and ending up in landfills.
In place of the tingi-tingi system, the EPRA promotes the creation of product refilling systems for retailers. It also encourages product makers to add proper disposal labels to their offerings. This would help educate consumers on how to dispose of the product after use. It also allows companies to retrieve the items that they made.
Types of waste are covered by the EPR law
Food and beverage containers are some of the most common forms of plastic packaging identified for recovery.
The Philippines' EPR Act identifies plastic waste as a recovery requirement for enterprises. This means that any packaging made from synthetic material should be collected and properly handled by manufacturers.
Some of the most common forms of plastic packaging include:
Food and beverage containers
Labels
Laminates
Lids and caps
Personal care/cosmetic product containers
Plastic bags
Plastic forks and spoons
Plates
Polystyrene
Sachets
Signages
Single/multi-layered plastics
Straws
Tarpaulin
How enterprises can recover their plastic wastes
There are several ways that companies can recover their plastic packaging wastes more responsibly, according to the EPRA. These include:
Buy back materials or wastes directly from consumers
Establish hubs where materials or wastes can be dropped off and collected after use
Conduct clean-up drives to remove wastes from areas such as public roads and coastal areas
Create waste management facilities such as recycling, composting, and thermal treatment centres
Target recovery rates
For large enterprises to adhere to the EPRA, they need to meet specific recovery rates in their waste management programs. These targets should be achieved within the timeframe outlined by the law.
Companies should:
Recover 20% of their plastic footprint by December 31, 2023
Recover 40% of their plastic footprint by December 31, 2024
Recover 50% of their plastic footprint by December 31, 2025
Recover 60% of their plastic footprint by December 31, 2026
Recover 70% of their plastic footprint by December 31, 2027
Recover 80% of their plastic footprint by December 31, 2028 and every year after
Implementation of the EPR law
The DENR will be the lead agency responsible for implementing the EPR Act guidelines through the National Solid Waste Commission.
The EPR Act requires companies to come up with their own EPR plan. They can also hire Producer Responsibility Organisations (PROs) to develop programs for them. A PRO is a group or firm that has extensive knowledge and experience in recycling, waste recovery, and reuse initiatives.
All EPR programs should be registered with the Department of Environment and Natural Resources via the National Solid Waste Commission (NSWC). This should be done within six months of the EPRA’s effectivity.
During registration, companies need to include key information such as:
The person responsible for the organisation’s EPR plan
Type of plastic packaging used
Verifiable volume or weight of plastic packaging brought into market within a certain period
Target volume or weight of plastic packaging for recovery
How packaging materials are labelled for recovery/disposal
Regulation
The Philippine government tasks the NSWC with regulating the implementation of the EPR Act. A new sub-group, known as the National Ecology Center (NEC), was created to closely monitor how manufacturers follow the law. The office will be headed by the Environmental Management Bureau assistant director.
The NEC’s mandate includes the following:
Keeping the registry of all EPR programs submitted by companies.
Monitoring the compliance of enterprises to their EPR programs.
Taking necessary action on public complaints against enterprises, producer responsibility organisations, and other related bodies.
Evaluating the volume or footprint of other generated wastes, for priority inclusion in the EPR scheme. This will be done within a year after the law takes effect.
Creating and maintaining a database of the recovery rate of all plastic wastes. It will also include a list of all processors and recycling companies, materials bought or recycled, and the price at which the materials were bought.
Providing training for staff on the proper management of solid waste.
Facilitating the creation and promotion of a “recycling market” consisting of organisations that will help make recycling easier for the public.
Rewards and penalties
To helppromotethe adoption ofsustainable waste management, the EPR Act has outlined a reward system for relevant organisations. Manufacturers can apply for various tax incentives related to their EPR programs. These incentives will be made possible through the National Internal Revenue Code.
According to the law, all costs related to EPR activities will be considered “necessary expenses deductible from gross income”. However, the implementation is still subject to substantiation requirements under the Philippines' tax code.
Meanwhile, large enterprises that fail to meet the necessary recovery rates will face heavy fines from the government. The penalty could be equivalent to twice the amount of recovery and diversion of the plastic footprint or its shortfall. It could also be based on the list of fines set by the EPR Act, whichever is higher.
1st offense – P5 million to P10 million
2nd offense – P10 million to P15 million
3rd offense – P15 million to P20 million
All cases of violations of the EPR Act will be handled by the DENR’s Pollution Adjudication Board. The body will be responsible for hearing and judging of cases, as well as imposing fines on violators.
Conclusion
Green Antz helps local businesses recover their plastic packaging waste and transform them into eco-bricks.
While the concept behind the EPR Act is no longer new, not many organisations fully understand its purpose. There is still some misunderstanding as to what the Philippine government expects large enterprises to do. For the new law to work, this confusion needs to be addressed through the right dissemination of information.
At Arowana Impact Capital, we believe in the ideals of the Extended Producer Responsibility Act. The law provides a clear plan for cutting plastic pollution in the country. One important aspect to note is how companies stand to benefit from the EPR Act financially. By offering reasonable tax incentives, businesses will be more inclined to take care of the plastic waste that they produce.
The EPRA also highlights the role that producer responsibility organisations will play in the success of companies’ programs. PROs provide businesses with the knowledge and technical know-how to recover plastic packaging waste. This makes it possible for organisations to meet the law’s strict guidelines.
Green Antz, the cornerstone investment of AIC, is an example of a PRO that helps enterprises collect their plastic waste. The company operates several eco hubs where companies can drop off their plastic packaging. Green Antz transforms the recovered plastics into eco-bricks, which can be used to construct green buildings.
The Circular Economy - Everything You Need to Know
The circular economy offers organisations a systematic way of solving some of the biggest problems of the world today. The economic model focusses on extending the value of existing raw materials and products to mitigate the impacts of materials extraction. It also prioritises the use of renewable energy over fossil fuels to help curb carbon emissions in many industries.
Far from being a recent invention, the concept of circularity has been around for a very long time. Societies have been experimenting with cycles and feedback loops in production for thousands of years. However, it was not until the advent of global crises, such as climate change and biodiversity loss, that CE solutions became widely accepted.
Now, more governments and businesses have started to adopt the circular economy approach. The future of many industries depends on how they can effectively use the finite resources available in the world.
What is a circular economy?
The circular economy model preserves the value of raw materials and other components through sharing, leasing, reusing, repairing, refurbishing, and recycling existing materials.
A circular economy (CE) isan economic system that makes use of restorative or regenerative industrial processes and economic activities. The objective is to preserve the value of raw materials, components, and products as much as possible. This is done through sharing, leasing, reusing, repairing, refurbishing, and recycling existing materials.
In a CE, manufacturers try to reduce waste to a minimum. When a product reaches its end of life, the materials used to make it are kept within the economy wherever possible. Further value is created by using the materials productively again and again.
Many organisations view the circular economy as a potential solution to global challenges. The Ellen McArthur Foundation, for example, believes it can provide society with the means to address biodiversity loss and climate change, while also tackling important social needs.
Elements of circular economy
Circular economies rely on renewables such as solar and wind to provide clean energy for production.
Researchers often point to three main elements that a circular economy needs to focus on to be effective: closed cycles, renewable energy, and systems thinking.
Closed cycles
Circular economies place heavy emphasis on closing material cycles. During the manufacturing process, every residual stream is used to make a new product so that no waste is left. Residual flows are often segregated between biological and technical cycles. Toxic substances are also taken out of production.
In a CE, businesses take back the products from customers after use. This allows them to repair the used items and give them a new useful life. For this system to work, products, components, and raw materials should be kept in high quality.
Renewable energy
Another key element of circular economies is their use of renewable energy. Just like with raw materials, CE businesses prioritise extending the value of energy resources as well. This means sustainable power sources like solar, and wind are preferred over fossil fuels.
The concept of circularity can also be used in the production of renewable energy materials and equipment. By using existing materials within the economy, manufacturers can minimise the extraction of new raw materials. This, in turn, can help reduce the negative impacts of such activities on the climate, biodiversity, and society.
Systems thinking
Systems thinking also plays a key role in the effectiveness of circular economies. Every person, company, and organism included in the system is connected to each other. This means every action that one stakeholder takes can affect other members of the network.
In a circular economy, every single decision should always consider its short-term and long-term consequences. Stakeholders should also factor in the potential impact of each action on the entirety of the value chain.
Circular economy vs linear economy
The CE model eschews cattle raising in favour of producing beef alternatives to eliminate high levels of GHG (methane) emissions.
The concept of circular economy was developed as a more sustainable alternative to the traditional linear economy model.
In LE, manufacturers follow a “take-make-dispose” strategy where they collect raw materials and turn them into products. These products will be used until they reach their end of life and are discarded as waste. To create value, businesses would have to produce and sell as many products as they possibly can.
On the other hand, CE follows the 3R (reduce-reuse-recycle) strategy. Companies prioritise minimising the use of resources, maximising the reuse of products, and finding new uses for raw materials. Circular economy businesses focus on preserving the value of products instead of producing and selling as many as possible.
Sustainability through eco-efficiency and eco-effectivity
Circular and linear economies also have different approaches to sustainability. LE focusses on eco-efficiency, where the economic gain of production is maximised while also minising its environmental impact. By reducing the negative impact per economic profit gained, businesses can manage the potential overload of the system.
Meanwhile, CE focusses on enhancing the eco-effectivity of the system to achieve sustainability. By adopting radical innovations and system change, companies are able to maximise the positive impact of the system.
This difference between eco-efficiency (linear economy) and eco-effectivity (circular economy) can best be observed in the production of beef. One of the biggest challenges to raising cattle is the high levels of greenhouse gas (methane) emissions it produces.
To solve this issue, a linear economy would look at the way the cows are being fed and try to change it. Altering the type or amount of food the animals are given would allow cattle raisers to reduce methane emissions. This would essentially make beef production more eco-efficient.
However, a circular economy would address the GHG emission problem by not making beef from cows at all. Companies would rather develop a plant-based meat alternative that they can offer to consumers. By using plants instead of animal meat, CE businesses would help promote biodiversity, employment, and landscape management. This would make the ‘beef’ production eco-effective.
Advantages of circular economies
Switching to a circular economy offers several environmental and economic benefits for adopters.
A circular economy offers several advantages to both companies and consumers, making an appealing production and economic model. These benefits can be divided into environmental, economic, and business.
Environment
Lower greenhouse gas emissions
With its strong focus on sustainability, circular economies prioritise the preservation of ecosystems and natural resources. One example is companies’ heavy emphasis on limiting their greenhouse gas emissions.
By using renewable energy instead of fossil fuels, manufacturers can cut the amount of GHG that they emit. It also improves production since renewables like solar and wind power are much more energy-efficient than petrol.
CE businesses also try to optimise their use of raw materials and agricultural productivity. Through reusing and dematerialising, companies can rely on fewer materials and processes to create products.
Switching to a circular economy model today can help organisations significantly reduce their overall carbon levels. A 2015 report found that CEs have the potential to halve their CO2 emissions by 2030, relative to 2018 levels. It showed a 48% reduction in emissions across mobility, food systems, and the built environment. This number could grow even further to 83% by 2050.
Better soil health and resiliency
In the agriculture sector, the CE model can help improve the health and resilience of farmlands through composting. Farmers use anaerobic processes to ensure that important nutrients used in food production are returned to the soil. They also lower the number of residues that the farmers need to address to keep the soil viable.
Some circular economies have begun diversifying crops in their farmlands to improve soil health. This allows local insect populations to thrive, which also benefits other species that are part of local food chains.
Regenerative farming techniques such as these provide important habitats for microorganisms at the beginning of the food chain. They help hold more water in the soil, resulting in better fertility and productivity of farmlands.
Economy
Potential for better economic growth
The CE model’s focus on sustainable food and goods production also leads to better growth for economies overall. By eschewing the take-make-dispose strategy of the linear model, CEs can use and reuse natural capital more efficiently. They also find more value throughout the life cycle of existing products.
Preserves more resources
Many manufacturers still follow the linear economy model. Many of them assume that there will always be a constant supply of natural resources. However, the take-make-dispose mentality of LE businesses has led to severe natural resource depletion.
Ninety percent of global biodiversity loss and water stress are caused by resource extraction, according to the World Economic Forum. The practice also contributes to more than half of global climate change impacts.
The extraction and processing of metals and non-metallic minerals produce about 20% of greenhouse gas emissions. The production of plastics and other materials also adds to the increase in GHG levels. Current energy technology solutions can only do so much to mitigate these negative effects.
Circular economies develop smarter ways to use natural resources. By fully recycling raw materials used in production, it minimises the need to extract and process new resources. Recycling also cuts the number of materials that go to waste when they reach their end of life.
Creates new jobs for workers
Transitioning to a circular economy model also creates better employment opportunities for workers. CE businesses are often in need of designers and engineers who can develop new ways of recycling and repairing materials. This focus on innovation also leads to the creation of new business models.
Additionally, a World Economic Forum report suggests that circular economies can bring greater local employment, particularly in entry-level and semi-skilled jobs. These jobs can help solve some of the economic problems that many developing countries face. However, these benefits depend on whether labour markets can be better organised and regulated.
Indeed, several international organisations are optimistic about the potential of CEs for employment generation. According to an International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) report, an estimated 3.9 million people found jobs because of the circular economy.
The International Labour Organization (ILO) believes 18 million green jobs can be created through the CE model by 2030. Meanwhile, Global Climate Action Summit projects that more than 65 million new low-carbon jobs by 2030.
Businesses
New profit opportunities
A circular economy also leads to new profit opportunities. Businesses can increase their earnings by cutting their waste and energy costs through circularity. They can also improve the continuity of their supply.
Adopting circular methods can also help companies enter new markets that would not have been available had they still been in a linear economy.
Protects against volatility
For manufacturers, making sure that they receive a steady supply of raw materials is of the utmost importance. Without these, they wouldn’t be able to produce products to meet the demand.
However, several factors make it difficult for many businesses to secure their supplies. The availability of raw materials often drives up prices, making them highly volatile to depend on. Natural calamities and geopolitical crises can also severely affect supply chains.
Instead of relying on the procurement of new raw materials, CE businesses address the supply issue by cutting the number of materials they use overall. They create products made from recycled or reused materials instead. This reduces their dependence on volatile raw material prices.
Ultimately, the circular economy model helps companies become more resilient against disruptions in supplies.
Creates new services and opportunities
With the CE model opening up new business opportunities, companies will need to create additional services to meet the demand. The Ellen McArthur Foundation outlines three examples of these new services:
Collection and reverse logistics companies - To manage end-of-life products that will be reintroduced into the system.
Sales platforms and product marketers - To promote higher utilisation and longer lifespans of CE products.
Parts remanufacturing and product refurbishment offerings - To provide customers with specialised knowledge.
The report explained that specialised knowledge involves the collection, disassembly, refurbishment of products, integration into the manufacturing process, and introduction of the products to the market.
In many cases, companies can adopt these new services by creating subsidiaries.
Challenges to adopting a CE model
Poor access to recycled materials and a lack of technical knowledge prevent many manufacturers from adopting the CE model.
Despite the numerous benefits of a circular economy, many countries have yet to adopt this economic model. Businesses face several challenges that prevent them from switching their production strategy.
Many businesses still don’t have enough knowledge about available CE solutions or how to apply them. Some may already have the know-how but don’t necessarily have the competencies to implement such strategies.
Another challenge is the absence of a circular mindset in business owners. Many companies still view post-consumer products as mere waste. There are also those that don’t consider the sake of other stakeholders beyond their immediate customer base.
CE adoption is also hampered by the refusal of some businesses to even consider the potential of the model for innovation.
Concerns about economic viability
Unfortunately, only a few companies appreciate the financial benefits of switching to a circular economy. There are businesses who flat-out refuse to invest in CE solutions that would cost more than what the organisations could afford.
Some companies also believe that they might lose their competitive edge if they were to switch to a different market.
Lack of access to material
For bigger companies, adopting a CE model may not be that difficult since they could easily shift to recycled or reused materials. However, this might not be as simple for smaller manufacturers that rely heavily on certain raw materials.
Recycled or reused materials or components are still not yet readily available on the market. This makes it harder for companies to source enough materials for their production. Those that are available might not meet the right quality or are far too expensive for manufacturers.
Uncertain feasibility
There are also several other factors that keep companies from adopting circular approaches. Business owners are uncertain about the stability of regulations (such as carbon tax), as well as the viability of CE-related technologies (such as components reuse).
Some companies are also unsure whether customers would be willing to accept a switch to a circular economy. CE solutions cannot always be used as an alternative to non-CE practices since they don’t necessarily have the same quality or price level. This financial uncertainty leads many business owners to be wary of changing from a linear to a circular model.
Issues with scalability
Switching to a circular economy requires a significant change in consumer behaviour. It will make it difficult for people to buy into the CE model if they would have to put in more effort in doing so.
Also, not all companies can shoulder the high operating cost involved in implementing CE approaches. This can discourage even those who might be convinced of the potential benefits of these solutions.
There is also a need to create market-wide standards in implementing circular economy approaches. Some solutions, such as the reduction of material variation, can only effectively improve circularity if many companies in a given market adopt the measure.
Examples of circular economies
Several companies have already switched to circular economies to promote zero waste in their production.
Throughout the years, the circular economy model has been adopted in different industries. Companies have found various innovative ways on how to apply circularity in their businesses.
Fashion
Some clothing brands have started leasing their products instead of selling them. The approach builds on the concept of ‘sharing economy’, where access and services are prioritised over ownership. This allows the manufacturer to retain ownership of their products and keep the items within their production cycle.
For these companies, they take on the role of the manufacturer and recycler of the products. Not only does it extend their own responsibility for the items, but it also lets them produce more circular clothing.
Circularity in clothing is viewed as a significant step toward reducing waste. The UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) identified the fashion industry as the second most polluting in the world.
Consumer tech
The consumer tech industry is also adopting the CE model by offering leasing services for mobile devices. Some telecom companies allow customers to lease mobile phones instead of buying them.
The circular service lets the company keep a closed cycle for the recycling and reuse of products. More than 99% of mobile phones are returned. About 95% of these devices are then either repaired and reused or recycled by the telecom company. This allows the industry to cut as much as 50kg of carbon dioxide for each mobile device saved.
Food
Single-use plastics have also been a particular concern in terms of waste management. To address the problem, several restaurants have started using environmentally friendly containers for food items. These include cardboard packaging, cloth bags, and even recycled containers that were once used for another product.
Some food stores have switched to using biodegradable utensils and even tried using edible cups, straws, and plates.
Construction
Eco-bricks made from recycled plastics are now being used in many construction projects.
In the construction industry, more businesses around the world are now incorporating reused or recycled items in materials. Some have developed new technologies that use recovered plastics to produce eco-bricks. This helps reduce the number of plastic waste that could end up overcrowding landfills.
One example of this is Green Antz Builders, an environmental solutions company in the Philippines. Green Antz collects used plastics and turns them into eco-friendly construction materials. The company has also tapped local businesses and communities to donate their plastic waste, such as beverage bottles, tarpaulins, and CDs/DVDs.
Adopting a circular mindset
Despite the potential of the circular economy to solve many of the world’s problems, it still suffers from the same limitations as other economic models. Its solutions can only be fully effective if a large portion of society adopts and implements them.
Every stakeholder in the economy needs to do their part to maximise the value of finite resources and reduce the production of waste. Circularity, in this sense, can only work if every single link is connected.
Green Antz named Pollution Reduction Initiative of the Year at Environmental Finance Sustainable Company Awards 2022
‘Our vision is to become a quadruple bottom-line company that empowers communities,’ says Rommel Benig, Founder and CEO of Green Antz
Green Antz (GA), the initial investment of award-winning impact investing firm Arowana Impact Capital, has been named the top Pollution Reduction Initiative at the Environmental Finance Sustainable Company Awards 2022. The recognition represents a new milestone on GA’s journey towards a circular economy.
As one of the fastest-growing pollution reduction service providers in Asia, GA partners with local communities and corporations in the Philippines in collecting and converting low-value plastics into eco-friendly, durable, and affordable construction materials such as eco-bricks and pavers.
Environmental Finance recognised Green Antz for its:
Focus on the largest centres of pollution and waste generation while prioritising processes that deliver the most sustainable change
Innovative solutions that can deliver measurable, effective, and long-lasting results
Collaborative approach that aims to challenge current paradigms of consuming resources
GA aims to convert about 6,000 tonnes of plastic each year through 1,000 collection points that employ members of local communities.
While most recycling plants in the Philippines treat rigid plastics, Green Antz has set out to convert multi-layer plastic packaging such as sachets.
“Sachets don’t have any commercial value,” Green Antz CEO Rommel Benig said. “They’re not being recycled.”
This gave Rommel, who is an engineer by profession, the idea to establish a social enterprise focused on green initiatives tackling the Philippines’ sachet economy.
“We decided to embrace and eventually also pioneer the circular economy model in the Philippines. That was really the awakening and the inspiration behind why I started doing this,” he said.
“We are setting up our Eco-hubs across the country, in different locations, so that we can collect the plastics directly from the communities and also build a model that's socially inclusive,” Rommel said.
“We are addressing environmental problems associated with plastics and other solid waste and – at the same time – creating livelihood at a grassroots level. This is really part of our vision to become a quadruple bottom-line company where we are pursuing not just profit but also empowering people that have a purpose.”
In March 2022, AIC completed its cornerstone investment in Green Antz. The investment allows GA to tackle Asia’s burgeoning plastic waste problem, whilst offering cost-effective and environmentally responsible alternatives to traditional building materials.
Arowana ranks within Top 50 globally again in 2021 Real Leaders Impact Awards
For over a decade, Real Leaders―the world’s first business and sustainable leadership magazine―has been recognising leaders and organisations that make a positive social or environmental impact with the Real Leaders Impact Awards.
We are very proud to announce that for the second straight year, Real Leaders has recognised Arowana's commitment to the triple bottom line of people, profit, and planet. This year we’ve earned a No. 27 ranking among the top 150 Impact Companies worldwide.
As a certified B Corp since 2018, we earned this spot thanks to our “Force for Good” score on the B Impact Assessment. We have a long-term commitment to building strong, sustainable businesses that will positively impact economies, industries, and the people they employ. Today our operating companies and investments include electric vehicles, renewable energy, vocational education, technology and software, road infrastructure services, and impact asset management.
Mark Van Ness, Founder of Real Leaders said: “These top impact companies prove that businesses can thrive by being a force for good. They are the Real Leaders of the New Economy.”
The 2021 award-winners include game-changers such as Tesla, Beyond Meat, Patagonia, and 147 other well-respected impact brands of all sizes and from a variety of industries.
Kevin Chin, Founder & Chairman of Arowana said: “We are honoured to accept Arowana's second Real Leaders Impact Award. At Arowana, we always consider the impact of our actions and strive to act responsibly, and we aspire to see businesses and economies grow in a sustainable way. This aligns with the Real Leaders mission to find profitable solutions that also benefit humankind."
A special ceremony will be held on January 27th, 2021 to honour the winners and will include key impact speakers featuring Seth Goldman, Chairman of Beyond Meat and a musical performance from Michael Franti, world-renowned musician and activist.
Arowana Impact Capital partners with Jollibee Foundation for Philippines food relief
Arowana Impact Capital has partnered with Jollibee Group Foundation to help mitigate the impact of the pandemic by promoting access to food. More than 1,000 food packs are being distributed to the families in Tondo, Manila with the help of St. John Bosco, Grameen Pilipinas, and Dana Asia. As part of a certified B Corporation, we are determined to use our business as a force for good.