Medium | Data Science Insights: Quantifying Non-Fungible Token (NFT) energy costs via simulation

There is unquestionable interest surrounding the production and sale of non-fungible tokens (NFTs). An NFT is a digital asset that represents ownership in real-world objects (these can vary from art to music, etc.). A recent sale of the artwork, “Everydays: The first 5000 days” for $69m made news headlines. NFTs are produced on the Ethereum blockchain, and among other criticisms, these are notorious for their significant energy consumption. In fact, the production of one NFT (inclusive of minting, bidding, selling, etc.) is purported to require ~369 kWh of electricity.

However, the landscape is set to change imminently. Ethereum 1.0 is in the process of transitioning to Ethereum 2.0 (Eth2) in Q1/Q2 2022, and in doing so, will move from a Proof-of-Work (POW) to a Proof-of-Stake (POS) consensus system. This transition means that the energy requirements are estimated to drop somewhere in the order of 100x to 10,000x, although we believe that the former is indeed more likely. Accordingly, NFTs are likely to reduce their environmental impact quite significantly. But how great will this reduction be? Given the uncertainty in many of our model parameters, this is a difficult metric to quantify, and one should account for uncertainty in parameter values, as well as the interplay of such parameters.

In this note, we seek to:

  • provide an overview of the variability in electricity costs across the US;
  • discuss some of the expected changes in the transition from Ethereum 1.0 to Ethereum 2.0;
  • explore some of the key differences in POW and POS consensus protocols; and
  • introduce a simulation-based framework to estimate the distribution of potential NFT cost paths over the next year.

Retail electricity costs in the United States

As of April 2021, the average price a residential customer in the US would pay for electricity is ~ 13.31 cents/kWh. However, there is significant variability in electricity costs over time, and perhaps more importantly, there is pronounced variability in the cost of electricity between states. The state with the lowest electricity rate is Louisiana, paying an average of 9.53 cents/kWh. Below, we display the spatial distribution of electricity costs across the country.

Cost of retail electricity prices across the United States
Cost of retail electricity prices across the United States

Changes in the move from Ethereum 1.0 to Ethereum 2.0

Ethereum 2.0 refers to a collection of upgrades that are designed to enhance the scalability, security, and sustainability of the Ethereum platform. The vision includes:

  • Improved scalability: Managing 1000s transactions per second, and making applications run fast, and with an intuitive feel
  • Security: Building protocol protection against various forms of attack
  • Sustainability: Reducing the use of power and energy in the platform

Proof of stake (POS) vs Proof of work (POW)

The table below outlines the key differences between the POS and POW consensus protocol methodologies.

Proof of stake vs Proof of work

Uncertain variables surrounding NFT energy consumption

When considering the cost of NFT production over the proceeding year, one notices that it is a function of several parameters, namely:

  1. time of the switch from Ethereum 1.0 to Ethereum 2.0
  2. magnitude of reduction in energy usage when the switch to Ethereum 2.0 occurs
  3. cost of electricity
  4. energy consumption required to produce an NFT

Estimating NFT cost via simulation

To explore the most probable cost of NFT production over the proceeding year, we design a simulation framework to study the distribution of NFT cost paths. To account for the uncertainty in aforementioned variables 1–4, we treat key parameters as random variables and run 25,000 simulations to explore the distribution of possible scenarios. Given the uncertainty in our parameters, we make the following assumptions regarding model parameters:

  • the metric of interest is a total cost path for producing one NFT per day for one full year
  • we study the full year from 1/9/2021–31/8/2022
  • the cost of electricity is treated as a Gaussian random variable and is assumed to be centred at 3.5 cents/kWh (our Arowana estimate of a wholesale electricity rate)
  • average kWh per NFT is treated as a Gaussian random variable and is assumed to be centred at 369 kWh/NFT
  • the magnitude of the reduction in average kWh per NFT post-Ethereum 2.0 is treated as a log-uniform random variable with a lower bound of 100x and an upper bound of 1,000x
  • the number of days until Ethereum 2.0 transition is treated as a Gaussian random variable and assumed to be centred 210 days away (end of Q1 2022)
  • the cost of producing 1 NFT = # kWh required for NFT production x cost of electricity

One can see the most probable parameter values for (1) # days until Ethereum 2.0 activation and (2) the magnitude of the reduction in electricity production after the transition below:

25000 samples from prior distributions to demonstrate probability densities
25,000 samples from prior distributions to demonstrate probability densities

The simulation procedure integrates over a range of possible scenarios, taking account of their interactions, and producing paths of NFT costs. The sharp reduction in costs (with varying magnitudes) most prominently reflects the timing and impact of the switch to Ethereum 2.0.

25000 sample cost paths for NFT production model
25,000 sample cost paths for NFT production model

Our simulation procedure suggests that, for one concerned with the electricity cost of producing 1 NFT per day for the proceeding year, it will likely cost ~ $2,715. One should note that this result is highly dependent on the underlying model assumptions, and should one have strong prior beliefs regarding parameter values, the simulation can easily be adjusted to account for this.

Total cost distribution for daily NFT production for 1 year
Total cost distribution for daily NFT production for 1 year

Read More

September 2022

VivoPower Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2022

September 2022

VivoPower Announces Memorandum of Understanding for Tembo Electric Light Vehicles in Jordan

July 2022

VivoPower International PLC Announces Tembo EV order from Atlas Iron, part of Hancock Prospecting

July 2022

VivoPower International PLC Announces Strategic Reorganization and Divestiture of Non-Core Business Units

June 2022

The Circular Economy Must Be Inclusive to Succeed

June 2022

VivoPower International PLC Announces Largest Solar Contract to Date for the 204MWdc Edenvale Solar Farm

1 2 3 14
crossmenu